Network for Research into Women’s History (Australia)

20 Jul

The Australian Historical Association conference in Melbourne was overly big and unwieldy, as always: it is always less rewarding to go to something with masses of parallel sessions like that than to a smaller affair. The best part of the conference for me in this regard was the Network for Research into Women’s History, organised by Penny Russell: a day’s session on ‘Feminism and Sexuality’. There was a sense of collegiality and even intimacy there which was absent from the rest of proceedings.

In particular, Susan Magarey gave a wonderful and even hilarious paper on the sexual experiences and attitudes of second-wave feminists in Australia, herself included. Many of the people she was talking about were in the room: people who came of age in the 1970s, so to speak, and were either laughing or blushing as she went along. That was quite special. I had the sense, though, that there were far more of Susan Magarey’s peers in the room than there were women in their thirties like me or younger. And I can’t remember any men at all in Susan’s session (there were perhaps three in the session in which I gave my paper earlier in the day).

The Network for Research into Women’s History needs younger men and women to sustain itself in future. So if you have it in mind to come to the day session at the Australian Historical Association’s conference on the Sunshine Coast in July 2009, let me know. I will be organising it, on a theme yet to be decided. Suggestions welcome.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Network for Research into Women’s History (Australia)”

  1. Andrew Leigh 22 July 2008 at 2:41 am #

    My benchmark these days is that the quality of a conference is inversely proportional to the number of parallel streams. My theory for why this kind of conference has proliferated in Australia is that it harks back to the old rule that the department will only fund travel costs for paper-givers. These days many places have changed this rule, but the ‘wide and thin’ model persists, at least for a while. Tis as true in political science and economics as in history, Im afraid.

  2. Melissa Bellanta 22 July 2008 at 11:59 pm #

    Hey Andrew! Your comment is sad but true. I’ll try to remember the Leigh benchmark when deciding what conferences to go to in future. – M

  3. MC 4 August 2008 at 12:50 am #

    More details!! Is Susan publishing the paper? Hard to tell from this, but maybe the self-referential practices of second wavers is part of the problem in recruiting younger feminists? Would love to talk more about this with you…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: