Comments on: What if not a military language? http://bellanta.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/what-if-not-a-military-language/ Ideas, reviews and research from a nineteenth-century cultural historian Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:30:49 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: david tiley http://bellanta.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/what-if-not-a-military-language/#comment-109 david tiley Sun, 03 Feb 2008 11:41:43 +0000 http://bellanta.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/what-if-not-a-military-language/#comment-109 Very good questions. My inclination would be to keep the martial language in areas of the story in which the participants perceived it like that, and rely on language that describes the tactics in detail elsewhere. I guess a lot of labour historians would say it was class war, and the stakes were that high. Very good questions. My inclination would be to keep the martial language in areas of the story in which the participants perceived it like that, and rely on language that describes the tactics in detail elsewhere.

I guess a lot of labour historians would say it was class war, and the stakes were that high.

]]> By: Historia i Media | History Carnival #61 http://bellanta.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/what-if-not-a-military-language/#comment-106 Historia i Media | History Carnival #61 Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:38:33 +0000 http://bellanta.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/what-if-not-a-military-language/#comment-106 [...] Bellanta in her post about the Maritime Strike of 1890 reflects on the language importance in historiography. Writing a chapter for a book to be called [...] [...] Bellanta in her post about the Maritime Strike of 1890 reflects on the language importance in historiography. Writing a chapter for a book to be called [...]

]]>